THE idea of a Directly Elected Mayor is good.
Unfortunately the devil is in the detail.
In Doncaster the idea was mooted when we were in the middle of the Donnygate crisis and, to many of us, a way of getting rid of the old leadership system seemed a good idea.
However, to fulfil the requirements of the position calls for someone of
exceptional ability and unique experience and this was not available within the parameters of the electoral system.
If candidature had been nationally open, instead of restricted to members of the local community, we might have attracted people of the right calibre. Our excellent MPs demonstrate this fact.
When the Mayor was elected he was one of only a few people, in local politics, not tainted by scandal. What a difference it would have made if competition had been open to – say – national business leaders or people who had served as officers in successful city councils.
Ironically one of the first things the Mayor did in office was to appoint a principal officer from the other side of the world. Which appears to prove my point.
I have never objected to the salary the Mayor collects, for the right person it should be even higher. I believe his first, of many, errors was in reducing the proposed salary. He obviously recognised his worth; he got that right at least!
Perhaps our MPs will use their influence to recommend a change in future, certainly before the system is extended to other electoral districts.
Betty Hill
Woodlea Gardens
Cantley
The full article contains 263 words and appears in n/a newspaper.